Exam DeVry University, Chicago - PHIL 347 Final Exam (2019/20) updated, Already Graded A.

Document Content and Description Below

PHIL 347 Final exam (Updated) 100% In the following argument, identify either the extra claims, or express the implied claim.......... 2. (TCO 2) In the following argument, identify either the extra c... laims, or express the implied claim. 3. (TCOs 3, 5) Describe the two styles of reasoning. What are some key differences between the two? (Points : 10) Question 4.4. (TCOs 3, 5) Discuss the three steps to follow when trying to distinguish between kinds of deductive arguments.(Points : 15) Question 5.5. (TCO 4) Considering only truth-functional claims, what are the four connectors? Describe what needs to happen in a truth table to demonstrate an argument is valid. (Points : 15) Question 6.6. (TCO 5) When evaluating analogical arguments, you need to consider three things. What are those things, and how do they need to be considered? (Points : 15) Question 7.7. (TCO 5) In Chapter 10, the authors discuss two methods for demonstrating that one event caused another. Name those methods, and briefly describe how each provides this demonstration of cause. (Points : 10) Question 8.8. (TCO 7) Chapter 12 discusses six steps to creating an argumentative paper. Briefly list those six steps, and mention at least one important item to be covered in each step. (Points : 25) Question 9.9. (TCO 7) Write a short essay (200–400 words) on whether torture is ever acceptable. Be sure to introduce your fallacy free-argument and provide at least one supportive point, one legitimate objection, your assessment of that objection, and a summary of your argument. Include documentation, and have clear paragraphs. (Points : 40)..... [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 3 pages